macOS Proxy Guide

Start here if you are choosing a macOS debugging proxy.

Rockxy is the option to look at if you want a native Mac app, public source, no account signup, and core HTTP debugging tools you can evaluate before you pay for anything. This page points you to the right comparison based on what you are actually deciding between.

Current public release on the site: v0.24.0 build 37, released 2 Jun 2026 as a signed universal macOS download.

Why Rockxy is worth a serious look

Public source and release trail

Rockxy publishes its source, release notes, versioned assets, and checksums in public. You can inspect what the app does and what changed before you install it.

Native macOS app

Rockxy is built for macOS with SwiftUI and AppKit, ships as a universal Mac binary, and focuses on the workflow Mac developers use every day.

Local-first by default

Captured traffic stays on your Mac. Rockxy does not require an account and does not depend on a cloud backend.

Choose the page that matches your question

These comparison paths answer the most common searches around macOS HTTP debugging, HTTPS interception, packet capture, and MITM proxy tools.

How to decide faster

Most Mac developers do not need ten tabs for this choice. These two checks usually narrow it down quickly.

Start with Rockxy if you care about

  • Auditable source code and a public release history
  • A native macOS app instead of a cross-platform wrapper
  • No account, no subscription lock, and a local-first architecture

Keep comparing if you need

  • A cross-platform tool today rather than a Mac-native one
  • A specific commercial workflow you already pay for elsewhere
  • More context on Charles Proxy or the wider proxy-tool category before you install

Rockxy is the right first download when trust and local control matter

If your shortlist is really about native macOS UX, public source, public releases, free access to core tools, and traffic that stays on your machine, Rockxy already answers the important part of the decision. If you still need side-by-side context, open the comparison page and verify the tradeoffs.